Search
en-USsl-SI

Urbani izziv Volume 24, No. 2, December 2013 : 96–111

UDK: 796.5:711.43(437.10)(436.1)
DOI: 10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2013-24-02-002

 

   Article in PDF format

 

Author

Bálint Kádár

Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Urban Planning and Design, Budapest, Hungary
balint.kadar@gmail.com

 

Title

Differences in the spatial patterns of urban tourism in Vienna and Prague

 

Abstract

In Central Europe the two major urban tourism destinations are Vienna and Prague – with both registering the same number of foreign arrivals in 2011. Despite the two cities being similar in their size and range of cultural tourism, they differ significantly in tourists’ spatial distribution and space usage. In Prague, congestion, overcrowding and the mono-functional use of the city centre is well known and documented, whereas in Vienna the city centre hosts a similar number of visitors without conflicts between local functions and tourism. Data obtained from geographically-referenced photography of the two cities uploaded to image-sharing web sites were used to build graphs of the spatial distribution of tourist attractions and routes. Analysing these comparable graphs resulted in some possible explanations regarding the differences in the two cities’ tourist systems. These are mainly related to the morphological layout of the two cities and their divergent approaches to developing urban tourism infrastructures over the past decade.

 

Key Words

urban tourism, urban morphology, impact of tourism, urban space usage, geotagging, Vienna, Prague

 

 

 

PUBLISHER

Urbanistični inštitut RS
Urbani izziv - Editorial Board
Trnovski pristan 2, 1000 Ljubljana, SLO

  + 386 (0)1 420 13 10
  urbani.izziv@uirs.si

ISSN

Print edition: 0353-6483
Web edition: 1855-8399

INDEX

GOOGLE SCHOLAR
h5-index: 12
h5-median: 17
INDEX COPERNICUS
ICV 2018: 121,25
CLARIVATE ANALYTICS
Indeksirano v ESCI


SCOPUS ELSEVIER

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

1.2
2020CiteScore
 
84th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

SNIP (2020): 0.48
CiteScoreTracker (2021): 1.5

Copyright 2021 by UIRS
Back To Top